Marie Weckerle vs Beatris Spasova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance has been slightly better for Spasova, who has recently won 35.86% of these points compared to Weckerle's 35.22%. Could this slight edge influence the match outcome? Possibly, as second serve success often aligns with match wins.
• In return games, Spasova again edges out Weckerle. Spasova has secured 53.36% of opponent's second serve points, while Weckerle has won 52.67%. First serve return stats are also in Spasova's favor, with 34.7% against Weckerle's 34.51%.
• Examining breakpoints under pressure, Spasova narrowly trails Weckerle, saving 41.94% compared to Weckerle's 42.06%. This minor difference might not significantly sway in-game predictions.
• Analyzing win percentages over the past year, both players have similar records, with Weckerle at 50.91% and Spasova slightly behind at 48.15% in matches won.
• Surface preference shows Weckerle excels on Hard courts with a 57% win rate, whereas Spasova prefers Clay, winning 47% of matches on this surface.
• Weckerle has mostly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, achieving a 42.86% win rate, while Spasova has participated mainly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, where she has a 52.08% win rate.
• Concerning opponent quality, Spasova has faced stronger competition with an average opponent rank of 177.17, while Weckerle's opponents averaged a rank of 383.76.
• If this match stretches into a deciding set, Spasova might have an advantage, winning 55% of all deciding sets compared to Weckerle's 50% over the last 12 months.
• Regarding breakpoint conversion, Weckerle currently has an edge, converting 44.39% of opportunities, whereas Spasova has achieved a 42.62% conversion rate.

Editorial Prediction (September 2, 2025, UTC):

Considering the second serve and return game stats, Spasova appears to have a slight technical advantage in this upcoming match. Her ability to capitalize on her opponent's weak points on the serve could prove crucial.

While Weckerle shows resilience under pressure with better breakpoint conversion rates, the qualitative edge seems to lean towards Spasova, given her experience against stronger opponents and her proficiency in deciding sets.

Although Weckerle's preference for Hard courts could be a factor if this match is on that surface, Spasova's recent form and strength against higher-ranked competition suggest she is poised for victory.

Based on the analysis of these key stats, Spasova is the likely winner for this match.